Tom Brosz, relating to the current uprisings in Iraq posted by Donald - "You and the media are no doubt going to be squirming in delight like puppies getting their bellies rubbed for the next few weeks. However, the picture is not quite what is being painted. This is not a spontaneous "uprising of the people."

Failing to understand that people want Bush replaced BECAUSE Americans and Iraqis are dying and are not happy about it is pretty bad. To accuse others of being happy Americans and others are dying because it makes Bush look bad is sick. We know Bush looks bad. We do not want others to die for his image.

Again, Tom Brosz, relating to a post by Raoul regarding terrorism - "Raoul's dDefinition of terrorisim: innocent people being murdered by someone other than Saddam. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2004 9:02:02 AM"

That, too, is slanderous, and beneath contempt.

I asked the guy to read his posts, and to cease slandering other folks on the board. Didn't happen, he redefined what he had said, and defended THAT, in the process re-attacking others including me.

Maybe it's because things are going so poorly for the conservative agenda in Iraq. And the rest of the world. I don't know.

Maybe I deserve that sort of nonsense. God knows I've gone over the top before, and even on occasion been properly chastized by Tom for that. But others don't. And I doubt that I do.

I guess there's no reason to read him. No more than ebnelson. And that's sad, because I like Tom when he is sane. Since I'm not going to tolerate that part of him any more, and I've asked him to moderate and just get more of the same, I guess he's made a choice.

Arf