Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to oh joy, the village idiot is back...

no one wil hold it against youiot is back...

let's see if this thing works at all

First off, you need to define "terrestrial". As Nick has pointed out, a moon is required to provide tectonics for the differentiation of land and ocean. Both are probably requirements for "terretrial" type plnaets - those capable of developing advanced intelligent life.

Solely looking at a planets orbit around its star or its spectra does not suffice to establish whether it is "terrestrial " or not. Therfore a "Terrestrial Planet Finder" which relies on anything less than imaging a suspected "terrestrial" planet ab initio is not a "Terrestrial Planeet Finder".

But this is realy a moot point. NASA is specificially enjoined by Congressional legistlation for looking for extra-terrestrial intelligence, and can not fund radio searches, little less optical ones such as some have proposed, without a change in authorizing legislation - talk to the SETI foks if you do not believe me.

in closing today's commet, I'd just like to add,
have a nice day,
ep

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (12 posts)