Supporting the raw, naked, illegal and unprovoked aggression against a relatively defenseless Third-world country wpuld define a warmonger.
Encouraging the inevitable deaths, maiming and suffering by innocent people by promoting gratuitous violence against another country is, I'm afraid, what warmongers do.
And while I understand your desire to not be called a warmonger, that doesn't change facts.
And attempting to insult me doesn't change facts. The reality is that I could be dumb as a post, and still warmongers would be warmongers.
Simple, no?
I believe it's also a trait of warmongers to call the folks who aren't warmongers "gutless". Part of the swagger, part of the warmonger persona.
Now, do you want to back off that one? Usually a warmonger would when called on it, because there isn't a lot of, shall we say, personal backbone in a warmonger. But you may well be the exception.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Not everyone who supports the actions in Iraq is a warmonger...
Neither of those statements is true.
The whole thread (26 posts)
- 60th anniversary of the Battle of Exercise Tiger
- re: 60th anniversary of the Battle of Exercise Tiger
- Guess I'm a crybaby
- re: Guess I'm a crybaby
- re: Guess I'm a crybaby
- Guess I'm a crybaby
- re: 60th anniversary of the Battle of Exercise Tiger
