You know, bluster isn't really an effective debating technique

Flame » in reply to OK, you can't. And most folks will be able to.

Tom Brosz — 5/4/2004 5:55:11 PM (archived)

I made a specific response to a specific statement. If you don't want to address it, fine. A hint, though. Emotional incoherence is not an effective debating technique either.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Ted Rall, still holding his own in the top five for "Asshat of the Decade" award. - Tom Brosz - 5/3/2004 6:41:57 PM
- I guess you saw the one on Tillman that MSNBC pulled (no link) - FrankC - 5/4/2004 12:50:19 AM
  - Nice try, MSNBC. Who the hell do you think you're dealing with here? - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2004 3:26:37 AM
    - By the way... - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2004 3:33:05 AM
      - Tillman wasn't any different from others who follow their conscience. - Bowser - 5/4/2004 5:57:12 AM
        
        Human shields - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2004 6:06:57 AM
        
        Can you understand the principle involved? (n/t) - Bowser - 5/4/2004 2:27:04 PM
        
        The principle involved - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2004 4:13:37 PM
        
        OK, you can't. And most folks will be able to. (n/t) - Bowser - 5/4/2004 5:22:41 PM
        
        You know, bluster isn't really an effective debating technique - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2004 5:55:11 PM
        
        Jeez. I agreed with you, and I get this. - Bowser - 5/4/2004 7:08:47 PM
        
        Okay, maybe I can clear this up. - Tom Brosz - 5/5/2004 1:06:43 AM
  - And Tillman died in Afganistan - Buck Galaxy - 5/4/2004 2:53:52 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (13 posts)