Current Events » in reply to re: Sarin confirmed in artillery shell

The whole thread (24 posts)

• Sarin confirmed in artillery shell - Tom Brosz - 5/18/2004 5:05:21 PM
  • Media spin of the day... - Tom Brosz - 5/18/2004 11:12:05 PM
    • You have proof of course - Tony - 5/19/2004 3:35:43 PM
      • Failure - Tom Brosz - 5/19/2004 8:28:13 PM
        • I completely can't see why either your A or B must be true. - alcaray - 5/19/2004 10:15:20 PM
        • Yes, Failure - Tony - 5/19/2004 8:44:17 PM
          • Okay, once more... - Tom Brosz - 5/19/2004 8:56:51 PM
            • Ah well, once more for me too - Tony - 5/20/2004 3:57:15 PM
  • Yesterday, you urged caution - alcaray - 5/18/2004 9:30:34 PM
  • Just the tip of the iceberg of hidden chemical weapons in Iraq. - David F Mayer - 5/18/2004 8:26:32 PM
    • Tempting thought. Hope you are right. (n/t) - alcaray - 5/18/2004 10:29:21 PM
  • I think if they had viable gas they'd be using it as gas. - Bowser - 5/18/2004 5:52:29 PM
    • Escalation? - Lindy - 5/18/2004 5:58:05 PM
      • The shell was of Iraqi manufacture. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/18/2004 6:14:00 PM
  • re: Sarin confirmed in artillery shell - REB - 5/18/2004 5:17:14 PM
    • Last Night; ABC 3rd story, NBC- 3rd, CBS- 4th - RobVG - 5/18/2004 5:25:21 PM
    • Unmarked shell - Tom Brosz - 5/18/2004 5:24:13 PM
      • re: Unmarked shell - Larry J - 5/18/2004 5:59:40 PM
        • by Jove, I think you've got it!.......... - Publius - 5/18/2004 8:41:30 PM
          • There was an unmarked nerve gas artillery shell - Tom Brosz - 5/18/2004 9:55:46 PM
            • Back in HS metal shop - alcaray - 5/18/2004 10:33:34 PM
              • I don't quite get where you're going with this... - Tom Brosz - 5/18/2004 11:23:36 PM
                • What did the empty shells we found previously, look like? - alcaray - 5/18/2004 11:40:31 PM
                  • I wouldn't change my vote based on one shell - Tom Brosz - 5/19/2004 1:35:36 AM