Definition problems again?
See my post below.
I call it as I see it, and I see people cheering the ability of a single government official being able to crush a private industry at a whim. For the good of the people, of course. The fact that such an "executive order" is even feasible is frightening.
I have been dealing with the doubletalk on defining "socialism" since I was in college. Suffice it to say, if the government can destroy an industry at will, or controls almost every aspect of how that industry is run, it's really irrelevant who actually "owns" it.