Current Events » in reply to Yes. They degrade over time.

The whole thread (19 posts)

• David Kay slams WMD delusions - Donald - 6/7/2004 1:05:46 PM
  • It's useful to keep track of how high the bar currently is... - Tom Brosz - 6/7/2004 4:50:13 PM
    • That entire slaughter is justified by ONE artillery shell? Old artillery shell? - Bowser - 6/8/2004 12:30:07 AM
      • re: That entire slaughter is justified by ONE artillery shell? Old artillery shell? - REB - 6/8/2004 4:58:39 PM
        • Did I, Bowser, go through the whole country? - Bowser - 6/9/2004 3:21:13 AM
          • re: Did I, Bowser, go through the whole country? - REB - 6/9/2004 11:56:47 AM
      • re: one artillery shell - Tom Brosz - 6/8/2004 12:45:23 AM
    • What does "newly produced" have to do with anything? - David F Mayer - 6/7/2004 8:59:35 PM
    • Blair set it for the Brits - tactical weapons 45 min. from deployment. - Bowser - 6/7/2004 7:09:28 PM
    • Does age of a usable WMD make it any less Lethal? - REB - 6/7/2004 6:52:43 PM
      • Yes. They degrade over time. (n/t) - alcaray - 6/8/2004 4:34:26 PM
        • Unmixed binaries don't. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/8/2004 5:07:21 PM
        • This one wasn’t that old. - REB - 6/8/2004 4:54:38 PM
          • Just answering your question (n/t) - alcaray - 6/8/2004 5:37:15 PM
            • Okay - REB - 6/9/2004 2:48:57 PM
              • Minor quibble about shelf-life - alcaray - 6/9/2004 4:00:05 PM
                • re: Minor quibble about shelf-life - Tom Brosz - 6/9/2004 4:28:36 PM
                  • Hard to reconcile - alcaray - 6/9/2004 8:26:58 PM
  • You should try occasionally reading the articles you post (n/t) - ebnelson - 6/7/2004 1:58:29 PM