I'm surprised you haven't commented after I made my point. Pure silence after such a good start.
>"In it's best form it implies the requirement of a higher standard of proof and a general aversion to the metaphysical."
I would agree with you there, but are you any richer at the end of the day? And I am waiting on the edge of my seat to hear you answer my previous question. Which is, what TV special did you see? Was it the one with the MIT students trying to reproduce the metereoric particles in a crop circle they made?
You see, I did produce the evidence from the scientific principles used from this study, including the XRD study. Seeing as this paper was done by this nations' clay mineralogist, and independently verified, it's rather hard to put him into the "radical left, angels or black helicopter crowd".
Swallow hard now, and get ready to explain the anomalies, without pushing it off to hysteria from the new-age metaphysical crowd.
<XRD Study>
Seeing as you started this Frank.........
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Crop Circles
- Believing crop circles are aliens trying to communicate
- Lobes
- re: Crop Circles
- Making a bet
- Ah you're all full of crap (except Raoul)
- re: Crop Circles
- re: Crop Circles
- re: Rational mind
