Okay, maybe I'm being too negative.
Maybe I should AGREE that I'm happy Hussein and his sons are gone.
Maybe I am happy that some of these Iraqis want "democ...ccc...cccracy".
And I guess I'm happy my SUV will have gas for the foreseable future.
What I am NOT happy about are all the lies, the cost to the taxpayers, the unnecessary deaths of our soldiers and the innocent Iraqi civilians, and the backlash from a new form of jihadism that this Bush administration foreign policy has incurred.
It wasn't about weapons of mass destruction. That people like Tom, Ed Nelson and REB STILL believe that Bush did this to pretect THEM, is (to me), totally preposterous. You guys would inhale pablum, if they put your name on it.
Current Events » in reply to One possible definition: Not ruled by a murderous dynasty with ambitions for WMD and the conquest of the Middle East.
Not ruled by a murderous dynasty.........
The whole thread (19 posts)
- Breaking News!!! Iraq is self ruled!!!
- Kindly define "self-ruled", if you would.
- re: Kindly define "self-ruled", if you would.
- Also: "martial law" and "state of emergency"
- From an Associated Press article...
- One possible definition: Not ruled by a murderous dynasty with ambitions for WMD and the conquest of the Middle East. (n/t)
- Always resort to the definition of 'is', when losing. Another pillar of the 'Bush lied' myth bites the dust. (n/t)
- C'mon Bowser, don't ruin it so quickly
- Kindly define "self-ruled", if you would.
