The left dressed itself in bipartisan support for the war when it seemed to be easy.
The left supported all through the 90's and up until spring 2003 the fact that all intel supported the WMDs.
The left betrayed the war effort as soon as it looked to be tough going.
The left persists in trying to rewrite history of the WMD intel.
The left second guessed every step of the war instead of unifying behind it.
The extreme leftists claimed it was imperial ambition or all about oil.
There are fewer and fewer shreds of crediblity left:
The fact is Iraq is now governed by an internationally recognized govt.
So where is the imperial ambition?
The fact is, the oil is being produced and sold under Iraqi control, so it was not about stealing Iraqi oil.
The fact is WMD programs, in violation of UN sanctions were underway.
The fact is WMDs are being found.
The disunity the left chose to introduce is transparent opportunism and has cost American lives and has emblodned the Islamo-fascist enemy.
There are not many shreds of crediblity for the left, left.
Ed
Current Events » in reply to re: Like what? Having a wish to make more WMD but not having them to use in a momments notice?
The emperor's new clothes: The left's moving claims about the war
The whole thread (19 posts)
- Breaking News!!! Iraq is self ruled!!!
- Kindly define "self-ruled", if you would.
- re: Kindly define "self-ruled", if you would.
- Also: "martial law" and "state of emergency"
- From an Associated Press article...
- One possible definition: Not ruled by a murderous dynasty with ambitions for WMD and the conquest of the Middle East. (n/t)
- Always resort to the definition of 'is', when losing. Another pillar of the 'Bush lied' myth bites the dust. (n/t)
- C'mon Bowser, don't ruin it so quickly
- Kindly define "self-ruled", if you would.
