re: Not abuse.

FrankC — 7/2/2004 6:51:46 PM (archived)

I agree with that, as it applies in the Mary Kay case but the point is would it seem to be abuse if it involved reversed sexes. I think it would and the offender would have likely been put away for many, many years on the first offense, never mind the second.

The whole thread (15 posts)

I'll probably catch hell for this post. - REB - 7/2/2004 2:11:34 PM
- Hmmm.... - R.L. - 7/4/2004 3:13:23 AM
- NOW we finally know why John Kerry rides a motorcycle (n/t) - p - 7/2/2004 5:24:14 PM
- I'm sure the 14 year old boy was severely traumatized.... NOT - Buck Galaxy - 7/2/2004 3:53:45 PM
  - The psychological pathology of a grown woman attracted to boys is a whole new subject. - Tom Brosz - 7/2/2004 5:36:24 PM
- Not from me. - Tom Brosz - 7/2/2004 3:31:56 PM
  - re pic: good engineering :) (n/t) - Daniel L - 7/3/2004 8:30:43 AM
  - No victim "probably" - FrankC - 7/2/2004 4:39:54 PM
    - Victim or not, it's still abuse of authority - Tom Brosz - 7/2/2004 5:27:10 PM
    - Mary Kay Letourneau didn't get off lightly. - RobVG - 7/2/2004 5:16:18 PM
      - Depends on how you look at it - FrankC - 7/2/2004 6:07:12 PM
        
        Not abuse. - RobVG - 7/2/2004 6:43:23 PM
        
        re: Not abuse. - FrankC - 7/2/2004 6:51:46 PM
        
        Now it's my time to step into the fire. - Lee - 7/2/2004 10:55:14 PM
  - What's the best way to get drool off a keyboard? (n/t) - McFly - 7/2/2004 4:03:53 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)