The idea that Donna Hare, who was a part-time employee with a NASA contractor with no security clearance would be allowed into a super secret area to observe classified airbrushing of flying saucers from satellite photographs is beyond credibility.
Actually, everyone there knew about Donna's propoensity to believe in flying saucers - she was active in a local UFO organization at the time. I suspect the technician she encountered in a photo processing lab was pulling her leg. If I had the opportunity to do so, I would have. It would have been great fun to watch.
Donna Hare is just another gullible UFO fanatic.
Think about it...if NASA didn't want you to see photos of slying saucers in their satellite images, they wouldn't have to engage in dubious and easily detected airbrushing. All they's need to do is not release the photo in the first place.
The whole premise of Ms. Hare's claim is ridiculous. It amazes me that there are people gullible enough to believe this junk.
Space/Science » in reply to re: So what was the Startling New Evidence?
Oberg's right
