re: try to read before j'accuse
"I have not ridiculed global warming. Get your facts straight. I have criticized the touting of demonstrably flawed models as being sacrosanct predictors of future details.
And in NO WAY is disputing somebody's scientific analysis remotely similar to likening the US to the Nazis. You are reaching way to far."
Well, now that you've reframed the issue, you're right. However, in the framing he provided, it was reasonably similar in terms of its degree to lunacy. I think you might agree to that. If one is going to demand people treat their arguments fairly and accurately, one ought to at least return the courtesy.