So, how would the U.S. have entered Iraq to quash the regime of Saddam Hussein acting as "liberators" instead of using tanks, bombers, and weapons? How do "liberators" act when defeating a tyrant's army?

Your idea of "indiscriminate" bombing seems to be a lot different than mine. You sure you were watching the same war?

Please enlighten me on how you think the brilliant Kerry would have done this. As far as I know, the Justice League of America is booked solid.

Perhaps for Kerry, France would have sent their indominatable forces, against which all enemies instantly sue for peace. Perhaps for Kerry, the U.N. would have grown a pair, and not run shrieking like little girls at the first sign of armed resistance. I'm dying to hear the Kerry Solution to Winning in Iraq. His "effective" solution.

So far, whenever I've brought this uncomfortable question up, the response has been fury, incoherence, and eventually leaping out the virtual window.

BTW, do you realize now exactly what the Left's psychotic obsession with Bush may put in office? Do you really have any idea what he's likely to do? Any idea at all?