It's either shoot-everything-in-sight, or walk away, appease.

You'll never understand a muted response, a targeted response,

Hell, we even HEARD about 40 missions the Aussies refused to fly because they weren't directed against military or resistance targets. How many more were there?

We even read about the Brits lecturing the Americans about their indiscriminate killing, even while reading about it.

However, someone with an "either-or" mentality, someone who thinks there is no middle ground between killing everything and walking away will understand.

They will say they do, and then in the next post talk about "appeasement".

If the goal was to "liberate" Iraq, no one in their right mind would have done it this way.

By the way, where's Rumsfeld?

Arf