We need to kill them first

phil — 8/11/2004 2:38:51 PM (archived)

says the always excellent Ralph Peters a former Army Third World troubleshooter with on the ground ME experience. He correctly bemoans the post Iraq War victory wuss-out by the Bush admin in not killing masses of 'insurgents' when it had the opportunity. Let's hope that now with this new opportunity we do kill as many of al Sadr's Islamofacisti as quickly as possible.

The whole thread (28 posts)

We need to kill them first - phil - 8/11/2004 2:38:51 PM
- hmm, Russians went full-force into Afghanistan - Art Martin - 8/13/2004 8:37:05 PM
- re: Stinging attack on Bush. I hope he hear's it and we take out Al Sadr. - Scott Evil - 8/11/2004 8:18:43 PM
- Insurgency battles - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 7:43:33 PM
- re: Very smart - Raoul - 8/11/2004 4:29:51 PM
  - any occupied population? No, not Vichy France (n/t) - p - 8/12/2004 1:31:22 AM
  - There are would-be "insurgents" in every population - Scott Evil - 8/11/2004 8:30:11 PM
  - "Occupied population?" - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 4:57:59 PM
    - re: "Occupied population?" - Raoul - 8/11/2004 6:15:19 PM
      - 20,000 insurgents is still only 0.08 percent of the population. - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 6:42:47 PM
        
        only 0.08% - Tony - 8/11/2004 8:51:49 PM
        
        rBritish probably said the same thing, after the Boston teaparty (n/t) - alcaray - 8/11/2004 8:48:32 PM
        
        1776: 1/3rd for independence; 1/3rd Torys ; 1/3rd undecided - phil - 8/12/2004 1:33:55 AM
        
        You know, this is what really upsets me - R.L. - 8/12/2004 8:05:38 AM
        
        Show me ONE other post where I even mentioned MOVEON.ORG - phil - 8/12/2004 2:41:59 PM
        
        re: Show me ONE other post where I even mentioned MOVEON.ORG - R.L. - 8/13/2004 8:40:24 AM
        
        That cuts both ways, RL - McFly - 8/12/2004 11:40:21 AM
        
        That's such a crock - Art Martin - 8/13/2004 8:59:33 PM
        
        Next time READ what I say before responding - R.L. - 8/12/2004 1:26:13 PM
        
        I did, RL - McFly - 8/13/2004 1:36:12 AM
        
        Boston teaparty: 1773 - alcaray - 8/12/2004 1:45:26 AM
        
        re: Boston teaparty: 1773 - phil - 8/12/2004 3:01:44 AM
        
        Boston teaparty: 1773-curious how does this play to Republicans? - Publius - 8/12/2004 8:21:00 PM
        
        re: "I was simply continuing on the thread." I knew you were a closet existentialist! - alcaray - 8/12/2004 3:44:26 PM
        
        Oh, so the Brits for fighting for an American democratic state? It was just misunderstanding; what a waste of time. (n/t) - gbaikie - 8/12/2004 12:43:17 AM
        
        Incomprehensible. Can you rephrase? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/12/2004 1:41:43 AM
        
        Oh, so the Brits [were] for fighting for a democratic American state? ... (n/t) - gb - 8/12/2004 8:07:23 AM
        
        This continues to have so little to do with what I said that it does not make sense. (n/t) - alcaray - 8/12/2004 3:46:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (28 posts)