Current Events » in reply to re: Boston teaparty: 1773

The whole thread (28 posts)

• We need to kill them first - phil - 8/11/2004 2:38:51 PM
  • hmm, Russians went full-force into Afghanistan - Art Martin - 8/13/2004 8:37:05 PM
  • re: Stinging attack on Bush. I hope he hear's it and we take out Al Sadr. - Scott Evil - 8/11/2004 8:18:43 PM
  • Insurgency battles - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 7:43:33 PM
  • re: Very smart - Raoul - 8/11/2004 4:29:51 PM
    • any occupied population? No, not Vichy France (n/t) - p - 8/12/2004 1:31:22 AM
    • There are would-be "insurgents" in every population - Scott Evil - 8/11/2004 8:30:11 PM
    • "Occupied population?" - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 4:57:59 PM
      • re: "Occupied population?" - Raoul - 8/11/2004 6:15:19 PM
        • 20,000 insurgents is still only 0.08 percent of the population. - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 6:42:47 PM
          • only 0.08% - Tony - 8/11/2004 8:51:49 PM
          • rBritish probably said the same thing, after the Boston teaparty (n/t) - alcaray - 8/11/2004 8:48:32 PM
            • 1776: 1/3rd for independence; 1/3rd Torys ; 1/3rd undecided - phil - 8/12/2004 1:33:55 AM
              • You know, this is what really upsets me - R.L. - 8/12/2004 8:05:38 AM
                • Show me ONE other post where I even mentioned MOVEON.ORG - phil - 8/12/2004 2:41:59 PM
                  • re: Show me ONE other post where I even mentioned MOVEON.ORG - R.L. - 8/13/2004 8:40:24 AM
                • That cuts both ways, RL - McFly - 8/12/2004 11:40:21 AM
                  • That's such a crock - Art Martin - 8/13/2004 8:59:33 PM
                  • Next time READ what I say before responding - R.L. - 8/12/2004 1:26:13 PM
                    • I did, RL - McFly - 8/13/2004 1:36:12 AM
              • Boston teaparty: 1773 - alcaray - 8/12/2004 1:45:26 AM
                • re: Boston teaparty: 1773 - phil - 8/12/2004 3:01:44 AM
                  • Boston teaparty: 1773-curious how does this play to Republicans? - Publius - 8/12/2004 8:21:00 PM
                  • re: "I was simply continuing on the thread." I knew you were a closet existentialist! - alcaray - 8/12/2004 3:44:26 PM
            • Oh, so the Brits for fighting for an American democratic state? It was just misunderstanding; what a waste of time. (n/t) - gbaikie - 8/12/2004 12:43:17 AM
              • Incomprehensible. Can you rephrase? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/12/2004 1:41:43 AM
                • Oh, so the Brits [were] for fighting for a democratic American state? ... (n/t) - gb - 8/12/2004 8:07:23 AM
                  • This continues to have so little to do with what I said that it does not make sense. (n/t) - alcaray - 8/12/2004 3:46:08 PM