re: Very smart

Current Events » in reply to We need to kill them first

re: Very smart

Raoul — 8/11/2004 4:29:51 PM (archived)

Shows how smart the insurgents are.

They don't attack, let the troops in, are friendly and choose the moment when the troops are off guard.
Any occupied population would have guys ready to do that.

If the policy is to kill those who might become the enemies, then there's no end to the felony and soon, nobody left on this planet.

Raoul

The whole thread (28 posts)

We need to kill them first - phil - 8/11/2004 2:38:51 PM
- hmm, Russians went full-force into Afghanistan - Art Martin - 8/13/2004 8:37:05 PM
- re: Stinging attack on Bush. I hope he hear's it and we take out Al Sadr. - Scott Evil - 8/11/2004 8:18:43 PM
- Insurgency battles - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 7:43:33 PM
- re: Very smart - Raoul - 8/11/2004 4:29:51 PM
  - any occupied population? No, not Vichy France (n/t) - p - 8/12/2004 1:31:22 AM
  - There are would-be "insurgents" in every population - Scott Evil - 8/11/2004 8:30:11 PM
  - "Occupied population?" - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 4:57:59 PM
    - re: "Occupied population?" - Raoul - 8/11/2004 6:15:19 PM
      - 20,000 insurgents is still only 0.08 percent of the population. - Tom Brosz - 8/11/2004 6:42:47 PM
        
        only 0.08% - Tony - 8/11/2004 8:51:49 PM
        
        rBritish probably said the same thing, after the Boston teaparty (n/t) - alcaray - 8/11/2004 8:48:32 PM
        
        1776: 1/3rd for independence; 1/3rd Torys ; 1/3rd undecided - phil - 8/12/2004 1:33:55 AM
        
        You know, this is what really upsets me - R.L. - 8/12/2004 8:05:38 AM
        
        Show me ONE other post where I even mentioned MOVEON.ORG - phil - 8/12/2004 2:41:59 PM
        
        re: Show me ONE other post where I even mentioned MOVEON.ORG - R.L. - 8/13/2004 8:40:24 AM
        
        That cuts both ways, RL - McFly - 8/12/2004 11:40:21 AM
        
        That's such a crock - Art Martin - 8/13/2004 8:59:33 PM
        
        Next time READ what I say before responding - R.L. - 8/12/2004 1:26:13 PM
        
        I did, RL - McFly - 8/13/2004 1:36:12 AM
        
        Boston teaparty: 1773 - alcaray - 8/12/2004 1:45:26 AM
        
        re: Boston teaparty: 1773 - phil - 8/12/2004 3:01:44 AM
        
        Boston teaparty: 1773-curious how does this play to Republicans? - Publius - 8/12/2004 8:21:00 PM
        
        re: "I was simply continuing on the thread." I knew you were a closet existentialist! - alcaray - 8/12/2004 3:44:26 PM
        
        Oh, so the Brits for fighting for an American democratic state? It was just misunderstanding; what a waste of time. (n/t) - gbaikie - 8/12/2004 12:43:17 AM
        
        Incomprehensible. Can you rephrase? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/12/2004 1:41:43 AM
        
        Oh, so the Brits [were] for fighting for a democratic American state? ... (n/t) - gb - 8/12/2004 8:07:23 AM
        
        This continues to have so little to do with what I said that it does not make sense. (n/t) - alcaray - 8/12/2004 3:46:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (28 posts)