Not a knock...

Geek Speak » in reply to In defense of JavaScript

Not a knock...

McFly — 9/7/2004 4:35:49 PM (archived)

Many people would be shocked to hear that JS is object-oriented...

I'm rather fond of Javascript, so I wouldn't intentionally knock it, but isn't it more properly described as an object-based language? Unless there have been some huge developments of which I'm unaware, JS is still missing some of the key facets of a true object-oriented language, most specifically inheritance.

Have I simply fallen behind the times?

The whole thread (16 posts)

Check out the new iMac - Tom Brosz - 8/31/2004 2:27:41 PM
- one day (need the bucks) - Daniel L - 9/1/2004 10:48:43 AM
- As a developer of web-delivered content and software - Davin L. - 8/31/2004 3:38:31 PM
  - You think you have it bad? - Robert - 9/1/2004 3:25:55 PM
    - What bug database do you use? (n/t) - RobVG - 9/6/2004 4:30:45 PM
      - Nevermind, caught your post below. (n/t) - RobVG - 9/6/2004 4:32:14 PM
    - re: You think you have it bad? - Davin L. - 9/3/2004 12:26:29 AM
      - In defense of JavaScript - Robert - 9/6/2004 6:42:59 PM
        
        Not a knock... - McFly - 9/7/2004 4:35:49 PM
        
        Knock knock - Robert - 9/8/2004 2:57:10 PM
        
        just 1 question - SDG - 9/8/2004 9:18:23 PM
        
        Code sample 2, formatted - Robert - 9/8/2004 2:59:41 PM
        
        My bad (n/t) - McFly - 9/8/2004 3:03:09 PM
    - And... - Robert - 9/1/2004 3:45:03 PM
      - I know how you feel - Todd - 9/2/2004 4:54:23 AM
      - That is a tough call, Robert - Daniel - 9/1/2004 4:45:39 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Geek Speak

The whole thread (16 posts)