Apparently so.
I guess when one looks to dogs for serious conversation, it should not be too surprising.
CBS worked on a hoax story for five years, deliberately went with docs they knew were forged, and still defend the basis for the story, nor have they apologized to the victim of their assault, the Preisent.
Fox wrote an op-ed, it used false and farcical info, and they admitted it and withdrew the op-ed piece immediately.
We all watch you demonstrate a near total lack of judgement, perspective and cognitive ability, but surely even you can perceive the difference between a CBS fraudulent assault made up of impeached witnesses and fraudulent documentation and an op-ed that goes over the line?
Surely you can tell the difference between someone apologizing for getting caught, as Rather did, and Fox apologizing for doing something wrong?
And as to dog pile, go to any of the many lefty blogs and bbs's that infest the internet, and then come back and make your sanctimonious claims about dog pile.
Ed