re: Strategically?

Raoul — 10/4/2004 10:31:10 PM (archived)

Nobody ever said that Iraq was the only nation on Earth that supported or tolerated terrorism. From a strategic standpoint, it was the best place to start.

Strategically???? But the US cannot invade any other country, now!
And after what happened, the US congress will never accept a new invasion!
It was a strategic disaster, to say the least!!

The US just doesn't understand and know how to deal with terrorism.

Raoul

The whole thread (13 posts)

Interesting development... - Tom Brosz - 10/4/2004 5:48:13 PM
- re: Interesting development... - Art Martin - 10/4/2004 6:27:00 PM
  - Red flags - Tom Brosz - 10/4/2004 10:22:09 PM
- re: Interesting development... - REB - 10/4/2004 6:22:41 PM
  - Saddam wanted WMD's? - Art Martin - 10/4/2004 6:45:19 PM
    - P.S. You saw how well deterrence worked on Afghanistan. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/4/2004 8:47:53 PM
    - re: Saddam - Tom Brosz - 10/4/2004 8:46:12 PM
      - re: Strategically? - Raoul - 10/4/2004 10:31:10 PM
        
        re: Never say never! - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 4:05:45 PM
        
        re: Strategically? - gbaikie - 10/5/2004 5:54:25 AM
        
        re: France - Raoul - 10/5/2004 11:39:26 AM
        
        Yes, Raoul. Some cops went into a town in south France and arrested some terrorists. - Tom Brosz - 10/5/2004 6:38:35 PM
        
        re: What is to stop the ETA from taking hostages and demanding the release of their brother's in arms? - Scott Evil - 10/5/2004 4:11:50 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)