Current Events » in reply to So, do you think the Iranian mullahs should have atomic weapons?

The whole thread (19 posts)

• Beating the drums of war. - Jack Herer - 12/1/2004 1:39:20 PM
  • War monger. - ebnelson - 12/1/2004 9:35:19 PM
  • So, do you think the Iranian mullahs should have atomic weapons? - Tom Brosz - 12/1/2004 6:51:56 PM
    • Do the Iranian's think G.Bush should have atomic weapons? (n/t) - Publius - 12/1/2004 8:30:53 PM
      • One question has the same relevance as the other.......... (n/t) - Publius - 12/1/2004 8:32:10 PM
        • Not unless you're completely divorced from reality. - Tom Brosz - 12/1/2004 10:35:03 PM
          • Ethnocentricity is not the equivalece of reality....... - Publius - 12/2/2004 8:03:06 PM
            • Objective judgment is not "ethnocentrism." - Tom Brosz - 12/3/2004 12:44:14 AM
          • C'mon Tom - LJ - 12/1/2004 11:14:29 PM
            • The Iranians (by which I mean their current leadership) are wrong. - Tom Brosz - 12/1/2004 11:37:57 PM
              • re: The Iranians (by which I mean their current leadership) are wrong. - gbaikie - 12/2/2004 5:49:45 AM
                • A more subtle point - Gary - 12/2/2004 6:15:29 AM
        • YGTBK. (n/t) - ebnelson - 12/1/2004 9:33:54 PM
  • re: I think he'll wait for the Iranians to nuke Los Angeles before invading. (n/t) - Scott Evil - 12/1/2004 5:15:49 PM
    • well, Since he has damaged US credibility so much- thats about the only way nowdays the world will believe Iran has a nuke. (n/t) - Davin L. - 12/1/2004 5:56:13 PM
      • re: He took a risk in attacking Sadam's Iraq - Scott Evil - 12/1/2004 8:38:39 PM
        • Come on--Ask the REAL question............. - Publius - 12/2/2004 8:10:21 PM
          • Depends on how you define "Invade" - Scott Evil - 12/2/2004 8:37:34 PM
            • "There is a lot of stepped up pressure levels that can be inflicted on" ...? "well in advance of an "invasion"." - alcaray - 12/2/2004 10:32:29 PM