Again, I cannot believe the number of times this bizarre argument comes up: "Why shouldn't the psychotic totalitarian ruler of some despotic country have nuclear weapons when nations like the U.S. and Britain do?"
This is like asking what difference there is between a policeman having a gun and a serial killer having a gun. It's all about the gun, right? What do objective standards of behavior have to do with it?
The Iranians have as much as declared that they would love to launch an atomic attack on Israel. Maybe you're one of those people who don't care, as long as it isn't an attack on the U.S. That's your privilege, I suppose. You can always hope the Iranians don't slip their favorite terrorists a warhead or two.
Current Events » in reply to One question has the same relevance as the other..........
Not unless you're completely divorced from reality.
The whole thread (19 posts)
- Beating the drums of war.
- War monger.
- So, do you think the Iranian mullahs should have atomic weapons?
- re: I think he'll wait for the Iranians to nuke Los Angeles before invading. (n/t)
