Off Topic » in reply to 2004: Movie of the Year

re: 2004

Tom Brosz — 12/24/2004 7:06:20 PM (archived)

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (19 posts)

• 2004: Movie of the Year - Daniel - 12/24/2004 6:47:32 PM
  • re: 2004 - Tom Brosz - 12/24/2004 7:06:20 PM
    • another take on that could be: - Daniel - 12/24/2004 8:28:35 PM
    • OTOH .. - Daniel - 12/24/2004 7:26:07 PM
      • Media - Tom Brosz - 12/24/2004 7:58:55 PM
        • More on "not enough troops" - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 2:20:28 AM
          • re Victor Hanson's arguments - Daniel - 12/25/2004 2:45:45 PM
            • re: re Victor Hanson's arguments - Larry J - 12/25/2004 5:22:54 PM
        • re: Another recent example - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 12:50:46 AM
          • the fact remains .. - Daniel - 12/25/2004 2:50:00 PM
            • The premise is a false one. - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 8:48:44 PM
        • Bottom line for me personally - Daniel - 12/24/2004 8:25:26 PM
          • re: Bottom line - Tom Brosz - 12/24/2004 8:35:36 PM
            • bottom line for anyone should be: - daniel - 12/25/2004 2:56:52 PM
              • re: bottom line - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 9:05:21 PM
                • FORGET the armour issue, and the press-accuracy issue. You did NOT reply to my moral bottom line - Daniel - 12/25/2004 9:21:04 PM
                  • it is understandable that .. - daniel - 12/25/2004 10:53:51 PM
                    • bottom line - Tom Brosz - 12/26/2004 12:54:59 AM
                      • sure .. - Daniel - 12/26/2004 1:09:58 AM