Well then it must be blindness.
Do the logic, Earth, water, panspermia, billions of years ...
It is ridiculous not to even entertain and attempt to falsify a biological hypothesis.
I admit we don't have much to work with, the spectroscopy embargo and all, but look closely at these brushed MIs, there is a great deal of three dimensionality, the brush appeared to have abraded quite a bit of material away, everything is crumbly, there appears to be many embedded rounded pebbles, the matrix appears to include hardened clay, it was impacted shocked, fractured and melted and then frozen and remelted in a water rich environment, I believe these are shocked fossil conglomerates derived from a water and biology rich environment over a basaltic foundation.
I reject a simple igneous interpretation of these materials, on simple logic and observation.
But then again, I'm just a crank.
Space/Science » in reply to No conspiracy
re: No logic
The whole thread (59 posts)
- Smooth inclusions in Wishstone rock.
- Squires on Wishstone
- UPDATE: Wishstone Rich in Phosphorus
- re: Smooth inclusions in Wishstone rock.
- Non-crystalline material?
- porphyritic basalt