Space/Science » in reply to Rare occurance, I agree- mostly- with DFM on this point...

The whole thread (32 posts)

• Latest news story on methane on Mars - Tom Brosz - 2/16/2005 10:31:59 PM
  • "Space agency denies report about Red Planet life" - jms - 2/18/2005 8:07:13 PM
    • NASA Public Affairs has already done the damage control on this one - Gary - 2/19/2005 6:50:33 AM
  • A lot more on this from "Badastronomy.com" - Tom Brosz - 2/18/2005 6:31:21 AM
    • the link went bad... - jms - 2/18/2005 6:37:32 PM
      • it's available via the homepage. (n/t) - jms - 2/18/2005 6:45:06 PM
  • Is there a difference between methane from life or volcanoes? - LJK - 2/17/2005 11:28:56 PM
  • I am STILL on record for believing that there IS INDEED life on Mars. - David F Mayer - 2/17/2005 11:17:26 AM
    • Not "on" but "under" - Nick Hoffman - 2/18/2005 3:05:13 AM
    • Rare occurance, I agree- mostly- with DFM on this point... - R.L. - 2/17/2005 9:19:51 PM
      • 1 Is Reasonable Given Life's Rapid Rise on Earth... - Mark Eby - 2/18/2005 2:07:34 AM
        • I agree that it SEEMS reasonable given our one data point, BUT... - R.L. - 2/18/2005 6:24:27 AM
  • NASA Ames team claiming "evidence of life" in CH4 - dtb - 2/17/2005 1:24:22 AM
    • This is very interesting - R.L. - 2/17/2005 7:36:39 AM
    • I suspect they were blind sided by Brian Berger - Gary - 2/17/2005 5:32:09 AM
      • blind sided - JimO - 2/17/2005 6:03:29 AM
        • oh joy... more ef***g good news - E.P. Grondine - 2/17/2005 6:29:00 AM
          • Uncle Eddie, my man...are you channeling Smythe? (n/t) - phil - 2/17/2005 6:27:48 PM
          • Survey question on back contamination... - Tom Brosz - 2/17/2005 4:59:27 PM
            • You've Been BDed Tom - Mark Eby - 2/18/2005 2:04:40 AM
            • Personally... - Adam - 2/18/2005 1:13:23 AM
              • Both of you are almost certainly right. - Tom Brosz - 2/18/2005 2:55:06 AM
                • sounding like a crazy tree-hugger, Tom (n/t) - pwokenyaw - 2/19/2005 2:38:44 AM
                  • Don't have to be a tree-hugger to know that rabbits in Australia was a bad idea. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/19/2005 6:36:49 PM
                • I Agree With Caution - Mark Eby - 2/18/2005 4:17:38 AM
          • more incoherent than usual - Adam - 2/17/2005 10:42:27 AM
            • re: more incoherent than usual - Doug Ellison - 2/17/2005 3:10:16 PM
              • Have you noticed that... - Gary - 2/17/2005 4:53:45 PM
                • re: Have you noticed that... - Doug Ellison - 2/18/2005 11:26:57 AM
                • Crazy Eddie - Adam - 2/17/2005 9:58:27 PM
                • re: Have you noticed that... - phil - 2/17/2005 6:30:48 PM
  • If it withstands peer review, it could be a real spur for more Mars exploration. (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/16/2005 11:03:28 PM