If he bribed one or two people it would not change the outcome...
Are you still trying to justify the 'we went to war in Iraq based on their WMD'S' claim...?
I thought you shifted your morals a while back to the "we invaded to free the Iraqis"...
Such transient morality must make life a lot easier, but you gotta stick with your latest justification until you are forced to change it... you are changing too soon Tom...
When this started it was not about the 'poor oppressed Iraqis" I have the past posts here to prove it... It was about the lie that Saddam had WMD and would eventually use them on us... that turned out to be a lie- It is a proven fact that we went to war on a lie...
You are too partisan to admit it, so you try to change the justification. YOU know that the justification was WMDs, you know you cant prove otherwise- you could be honest or you could be another mindless partisan hack- you chose the latter... too bad
Current Events » in reply to Saddam attempted to bribe U.N. inspector
Tom, they were inspection TEAMS
The whole thread (19 posts)
- Saddam attempted to bribe U.N. inspector
- If the honest inspector turned down the money, why have we no report that documents WMD?
- you're barking up the wrong tree
- "Why would Saddam pay two million dollars to doctor the evidence on weapons that we are now endlessly told did not exist?" (n/t)
- Tom, they were inspection TEAMS
- if you think about it with something other than your knee
- I'm waiting to hear it. (n/t)
- CIA Was With UN in Iraq for Years, Ex-Inspector Says... (Guess you forgot this scandal...)
- And the US didn't!!
