Current Events » in reply to Tom, they were inspection TEAMS

The whole thread (19 posts)

• Saddam attempted to bribe U.N. inspector - Tom Brosz - 3/12/2005 5:21:18 AM
  • If the honest inspector turned down the money, why have we no report that documents WMD? - Mary Anne - 3/14/2005 2:10:46 AM
    • Even you would have to admit that that's reaching a bit. - Tom Brosz - 3/14/2005 4:03:04 AM
  • you're barking up the wrong tree - tony - 3/14/2005 1:37:49 AM
    • Enlighten me. - Tom Brosz - 3/14/2005 1:55:25 AM
      • couldnt possibly be along the lines of - tony - 3/14/2005 4:23:06 AM
        • Reports - Tom Brosz - 3/14/2005 4:41:06 AM
  • "Why would Saddam pay two million dollars to doctor the evidence on weapons that we are now endlessly told did not exist?" (n/t) - McFly - 3/13/2005 6:55:24 PM
  • Tom, they were inspection TEAMS - R.L. - 3/13/2005 5:33:39 AM
    • Why bribe anyone at all? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/13/2005 7:10:15 AM
      • Why sneak spies onto the team against the agreed upon rules? - R.L. - 3/13/2005 9:23:59 AM
        • The article didn't mention anything about spying, did it? - Tom Brosz - 3/13/2005 7:53:56 PM
  • if you think about it with something other than your knee - tony - 3/13/2005 3:43:47 AM
    • I'm waiting to hear it. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/13/2005 7:12:15 AM
  • CIA Was With UN in Iraq for Years, Ex-Inspector Says... (Guess you forgot this scandal...) - R.L. - 3/12/2005 10:07:22 AM
    • The point eluded you too, huh? - Tom Brosz - 3/12/2005 9:38:27 PM
  • And the US didn't!! - Bowser - 3/12/2005 6:56:49 AM
    • I expected the significance to completely elude you. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/12/2005 7:06:17 AM
      • The US had subverted the process. What did you expect? - Bowser - 3/13/2005 3:48:15 AM