Let me be the first to point out the factual errors in my post
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98052&page=1
1) The seeds were only 100's of years old, not the thousands I claimed. One was 1200 years old, but didnt survive long.
2) The germination rate is apparently high- the survival rate is not high...
My statements regarding natural radiation degrading DNA still stand.
I HATE when people post false scientific information, and when I do it I will always acknowledge and correct the error when it is brought to my attention.
