You can say yea or nay to as many parts of my statement as you wish.
You are not entitled to draw conclusions about what I have tried, what I believe, and what I will allow, because the only experience you can draw on is what I let you see here, which is circumscribed enough to deprive you of enough knowledge to draw an accurate conclusion.
You can, however, rest assured that matters of faith are not subject to the tests of evidence required by science, as these two areas are not competitors, but complementary. To require believe of science, which is based on doubt, is to make science look weak. To require proof of faith, which speaks to things for which there is no proof, is to make faith look stupid.
Cheers back atcha.
Off Topic » in reply to I would have to say nay to part of your statement.
Sometimes called "prayer"
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Thoughts are Things
- People are actors
- My analysis of the crystals
- A little more information
- A "water crystal" is a snowflake.
- You are indeed correct!
- Crystals grow over time. (n/t)
- Wow...I really don't... ummm WOW
- re: What to believe and why
- Come on! Cut Lindy some slack
- Did someone really lick the can you mentioned?
