...a small warm pile...

Current Events » in reply to Global warming, a small update.

...a small warm pile...

et — 5/2/2005 4:47:02 PM (archived)

" Leading scientific journals 'are censoring debate on global warming" sez the Telegraph.

Hmm, I guess that makes sense. They've been censoring things for a long time.
You know, papers on the flat earth, "intelligent" design, face on Mars, and perpetual motion to name a few. Just cause the industry supported cranks trying to seed the debate with artificial uncertainty don't get taken seriously and have hurt feelings, doesn't make it censorship.

This reads like a plot from State of Fear.

You wan't some reading? You'll have to read it though, no peeking at the url and saying, "evil".

Climate of Denial

Heres the link to Real Climate, a science based, Slashdot like, comment page.

Real Climate

An over linked to sour grapes story, reveberating through the industrial emission loving righty blogosphere doesn't cut it. I bet Scott's buddy, the Greening Earth Society, is sucking it up though....

The whole thread (56 posts)

Global warming, a small update. - Tom Brosz - 5/2/2005 6:53:00 AM
- To paraphrase Will Rogers... - Fox - 5/4/2005 4:13:58 PM
  - re: To paraphrase Will Rogers... - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2005 7:26:59 PM
    - No - Tony - 5/4/2005 7:57:31 PM
      - re: No - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2005 9:05:16 PM
- How does one become a science "authority"? - Alan G. Archer - 5/3/2005 12:53:43 PM
  - Science "authority"? See Tech below. (n/t) - alcaray - 5/5/2005 4:17:02 PM
  - Easy - Fox - 5/4/2005 5:15:42 PM
    - No No No! - SDAI-Tech1 - 5/5/2005 11:28:40 AM
      - Yes, I know... - SDAI-Tech1 - 5/5/2005 7:25:37 PM
        
        Can't even post in the right order... ;-) (n/t) - SDT1 - 5/5/2005 7:27:28 PM
      - Out of practice, Tech1? - Fox - 5/5/2005 2:28:41 PM
- BTW... - et - 5/2/2005 4:55:00 PM
  - AH HA... The old "you posted on the wrong webpage" fallacy. - Scott Evil - 5/4/2005 2:34:43 PM
- ...a small warm pile... - et - 5/2/2005 4:47:02 PM
  - When other opinions are not allowed... - Larry J - 5/2/2005 8:46:38 PM
    - Science versus dogma - Tony - 5/3/2005 3:39:09 PM
      - More - Fox - 5/4/2005 2:33:59 PM
      - Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? - Larry J - 5/4/2005 12:23:19 AM
        
        civility isn't your strong suit, is it? - Tony - 5/4/2005 4:24:02 PM
        
        Nor yours... - Larry J - 5/5/2005 12:25:39 AM
        
        Faux outrage at slight that was neither intended, nor in fact, existing - Tony - 5/5/2005 11:12:51 AM
        
        A familiar ring - Fox - 5/4/2005 3:45:51 PM
        
        re: A familiar ring (HTML repaired) - Fox - 5/4/2005 4:19:50 PM
        
        The issue - E.P.Grondine - 5/4/2005 1:27:08 AM
      - Its called 'Gulf War Syndrome' - Davin L - 5/3/2005 4:04:34 PM
    - re: When other opinions are not allowed... - DL - 5/3/2005 3:22:17 PM
    - Science isn't about "opinions". Especially those poorly supported by emperical evidence. - et - 5/3/2005 2:49:48 PM
      - No...But you are the one who is believing in "creationism" here. - Scott Evil - 5/4/2005 2:18:16 PM
        
        You're a nut, and an ignorant one at that. Let's bring this to the science page. (n/t) - et - 5/4/2005 4:45:16 PM
        
        Where is that page? No...really? - SDAI-Tech1 - 5/5/2005 10:51:16 AM
      - Nice try, people. - Tom Brosz - 5/3/2005 4:10:25 PM
        
        re: "The comparison with the creationism flap doesn't stand up for a second." - Fox - 5/4/2005 5:06:14 PM
        
        Fox, look at the percentages. - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2005 7:29:09 PM
        
        Percentages, perschmentages. - Fox - 5/4/2005 10:30:19 PM
        
        Bias. - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2005 10:57:14 PM
        
        Oh, I see now... - Fox - 5/5/2005 1:05:31 AM
        
        Follow the money. - SDAI-Tech1 - 5/5/2005 12:31:15 PM
        
        re: Fox, look at the percentages. - et - 5/4/2005 9:00:29 PM
        
        re: the percentages. - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2005 9:07:55 PM
        
        Read the paper, then we'll talk. - what me frET? - 5/5/2005 2:03:33 AM
        
        I think he was making the argument that Oreske is a rightwing buttmonkey - Scott Evil - 5/4/2005 10:17:39 PM
        
        re: Nice try, Tom. - Tony - 5/3/2005 5:53:11 PM
        
        So what's Oreskes' educational background? - Tom Brosz - 5/3/2005 6:44:01 PM
        
        In case you missed the point, she isn't a climatologist either. Does it matter? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/4/2005 7:30:37 PM
        
        See post below - Tony - 5/4/2005 7:59:00 PM
        
        read the space thread - Tony - 5/3/2005 7:44:04 PM
        
        Wait, there's more! - Sam F. - 5/3/2005 5:21:53 PM
        
        Yes, we're SOOO pathetic..... - et - 5/3/2005 5:01:35 PM
      - Clearly, ET - Davin L. - 5/3/2005 3:17:23 PM
- The Sky is falling! The sky is falling! - A. Leftleaner - 5/2/2005 2:22:16 PM
  - no it isn't - E.P. Grondine - 5/4/2005 1:32:56 AM
    - If you ever talk to my wife that way again the only impactor you'll know will be your face hitting my fist. - Scott Evil - 5/4/2005 2:07:02 PM
      - Trivialize the impact hazard again, and expect more of the same (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 5/4/2005 7:10:04 PM
      - Aw, come on. She can take him. - et - 5/4/2005 5:05:54 PM
  - No, it's not sinner. - Betty Farrightenstein - 5/2/2005 4:51:30 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (56 posts)