The main thing behind having an enemy under your control is to have him inform you about his friends, isn't it?
By torturing him? Really?
The guy who's been tortured knew this too and he knows if he speaks, a) he will have to live with it for the rest of his life, therefore not speaking boosts his selfconfidence and pride of himself.
b) he will say whatever the torturo wants to hear.
None of this is helpful.
By talking to him in such a way he'd feel pride revealing what he knows? Much smarter!!!!!!!!!!!
But you first need to understand who he is, what makes him talk and what makes him defiant.
No need for torture, just adroit conversation and finding his weak point where he could unleash himself.
That's exactly how Dutroux got to reveal where the girls he kidnapped and let die where.
Raoul
Flame » in reply to A moral quandry
re: Torture for information?