Flame » in reply to re: A moral quandry

The whole thread (24 posts)

• A moral quandry - FrankC - 5/21/2005 1:48:12 AM
  • A moral quandry, or defining question? - Publius - 5/25/2005 1:30:07 PM
  • An example? - Bowser - 5/21/2005 3:30:53 PM
    • You lose your playbook? - Tom Brosz - 5/21/2005 6:07:52 PM
      • As pointed out elsewhere - alcaray - 5/23/2005 9:36:52 PM
      • this is about the INTRINSIC 'value' of torture, not about comparing yourself to your enemies (n/t) - Daniel - 5/22/2005 5:35:50 AM
      • Useful information - FrankC - 5/22/2005 12:15:21 AM
      • Show me the "playbook" or - - - . (Yer the guy who says Kennedy wasn't left-wing!) - Bowser - 5/21/2005 8:31:47 PM
    • Was it wrong ? - FrankC - 5/21/2005 3:48:22 PM
  • re: Torture for information? - Raoul - 5/21/2005 9:28:04 AM
    • The purpose.. - FrankC - 5/21/2005 3:37:26 PM
  • re: A moral quandry - Donald - 5/21/2005 4:12:11 AM
  • re: A moral quandry - p - 5/21/2005 2:14:45 AM
    • And when the guy you're torturing admitted to the assassination of Lincoln, would it give you pause? - Mary Anne - 5/21/2005 12:35:21 PM
      • Myth. - Tom Brosz - 5/21/2005 6:10:47 PM
        • Human sacrifice was practiced for a long time, too. - Mary Anne - 5/21/2005 8:57:48 PM
          • Trades - Tom Brosz - 5/22/2005 6:10:47 AM
        • re: Myth. - gbaikie - 5/21/2005 8:11:39 PM
    • Yep, I am in the Jack Bauer camp myself (n/t) - FrankC - 5/21/2005 2:45:37 AM
      • Works great in the movies (n/t) - alcaray - 5/23/2005 9:51:38 PM
      • 24 Flame - SDG - 5/23/2005 5:46:23 PM
        • re: 24 Flame - SDG - 5/23/2005 6:07:24 PM
          • I don't disagree... - FrankC - 5/23/2005 10:31:28 PM
            • I quit watching when they refused to show Kim nekkid (n/t) - p - 5/24/2005 6:16:30 PM