C++ and Java are also harder to read due to the OOP constructs. Most of the C++ source code that I've seen at NASA is little more than vanilla C with C++ comments and I/O.
Well, I'm certainly not going to battle with you over technical matters. I don't mind being wrong, but I draw the line at inviting someone to mop the floor with me :-)
My programming training has roughly followed this path:
Pascal, assembly, C, C++, Java, C#.
(Why jump from Java to C#, I can hear some people asking...primarily because one of our major vendors made the same jump, and I simply have to follow the ball. Turns out that C# and I get along famously in any case.)
Anywho, not long after starting to work with C++, I found trying to use procedural techniques just didn't feel right anymore. Classes became second nature...they quickly became integral to the way I design my code.
I'm not disputing your observations (heck, I *couldn't* dispute them)...just making one of my own.
Space/Science » in reply to No, that code snippet will actually run...
Run code run...C code run...PLEASE!
The whole thread (45 posts)
- a comment on the go for shuttle launch
- re: a comment on the go for shuttle launch
- re: a comment on the go for shuttle launch
- my view as posted on msnbc.com
- Could you imagine what the doctors would say if you had a backup heart?
- Intermittent problems are tough to fix
- re: Intermittent problems are tough to fix
- It's like the "array out of bounds" bug in C programming
- which is itself the best argument against C.
- re: It's like the "array out of bounds" bug in C programming
