Not at $10,000/kg

Space/Science » in reply to So do away with the foam.

Not at $10,000/kg

Gary — 7/28/2005 5:48:06 AM (archived)

The Shuttle's fuel is cryogenic. It must be insulated. However the insulation must be light weight for the vehicle to get off the ground.

Gary

The whole thread (41 posts)

Probable delay in next shuttle launch - Delbert - 7/27/2005 10:57:00 PM
- Strike One... - Nick Hoffman - 7/28/2005 12:57:22 AM
  - NASA maybe screwed - Gary - 7/28/2005 3:55:36 AM
  - THIS will be the Shuttle's last hurray! - Buck Galaxy - 7/28/2005 3:47:41 AM
    - Be careful what you wish for - Gary - 7/28/2005 3:58:02 AM
      - Those guys have already lost the battle - Buck Galaxy - 7/28/2005 4:10:29 AM
        
        This stuff is hard to do - Gary - 7/28/2005 5:40:12 AM
        
        Plus, people forget how long it took to develop Apollo - Larry J - 7/28/2005 1:32:10 PM
        
        Waste Anything but Time - ljk - 8/3/2005 3:16:38 PM
        
        There was about a 5 year percolation period before Kennedy's speech - Gary - 7/28/2005 4:25:07 PM
        
        Ditto on launchers - dtb - 7/28/2005 9:18:37 PM
        
        re: There was about a 5 year percolation period before Kennedy's speech - ljk - 7/28/2005 6:51:56 PM
        
        Computing power and engineering success - Robert - 7/29/2005 3:02:34 AM
        
        Rutan's method - Larry J - 7/29/2005 3:41:45 PM
        
        And Why Couldn't That Be Used To Test Artificial Gravity Concepts? - Mark Eby - 7/30/2005 2:47:45 AM
        
        Testing in Earth orbit is a good idea - Larry J - 7/31/2005 8:22:33 PM
        
        Interesting - Robert - 7/29/2005 4:30:00 PM
        
        What happened at Lockheed's Skunk Works after Kelly Johnson retired? - Larry J - 7/29/2005 7:08:39 PM
        
        re: What happened at Lockheed's Skunk Works after Kelly Johnson retired? - Robert - 7/29/2005 9:32:18 PM
        
        Hypersonic aerodynamics can fool an intuitive engineer - Gary - 7/29/2005 4:07:17 PM
- No shuttle flights until foam loss is understood - SteveS - 7/27/2005 11:45:17 PM
  - So do away with the foam. - Lee - 7/28/2005 5:36:31 AM
    - re: So do away with the foam. - drzarkov - 8/2/2005 9:31:36 PM
    - There maybe a way to contain that foam. - Jacob Samorodin - 7/30/2005 8:18:37 PM
      - re: There maybe ways to contain that foam. - Chris Vancil - 7/31/2005 8:34:25 AM
    - Why don't they put the foam on the inside? (n/t) - SDF - 7/30/2005 1:10:41 PM
      - re: Why don't they put the foam on the inside? - Tom Brosz - 7/30/2005 9:33:16 PM
    - Not at $10,000/kg - Gary - 7/28/2005 5:48:06 AM
      - Maybe they need to go back to the original foam - Larry J - 7/28/2005 1:43:06 PM
        
        "Green kills." - Tom Brosz - 7/30/2005 7:07:26 AM
        
        Yes - E.P. Grondine - 7/29/2005 3:06:10 AM
        
        Good idea. - Tom Brosz - 7/28/2005 5:53:10 PM
        
        re: Maybe they need to go back to the original foam - Delbert - 7/28/2005 2:11:32 PM
      - re: Not at $10,000/kg - Chris Vancil - 7/28/2005 7:27:39 AM
        
        re: Not at $10,000/kg - Doug Ellison - 7/28/2005 8:39:47 AM
        
        re: Not at $10,000/kg - Chris Vancil - 7/28/2005 9:51:59 AM
      - No foam on Energia - Lee - 7/28/2005 5:54:02 AM
        
        Energia used kerosene/LOX instead of H2/LOX - Larry J - 7/28/2005 1:34:26 PM
        
        No: Energia used H2/LOX for the Core - robert_d - 7/28/2005 4:54:23 PM
        
        You're right - Larry J - 7/28/2005 6:15:57 PM
- re: Probable delay in next shuttle launch - Larry J - 7/27/2005 11:43:38 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (41 posts)