re: But still relevant...

Space/Science » in reply to So yesterday's news...

Chris Vancil — 8/5/2005 7:17:01 AM (archived)

I brought this particular testimony here for Ed Grondine and those who view CAPS (comet/asteroid protection system) as the only reason to return to the Moon to read.

How come you reply to this thread but not the polling thread? I really would like your interpretation of the polling results that conflict with those you like to point to. two polls so far...

One poll had Lunar results which would indicate about 71% believe we will return to the Moon with in 25 years.

The whole thread (24 posts)

On Lunar Surface Telescopes: Dr. Daniel Lester testimony to Subcommittee on Space... - Chris Vancil - 8/4/2005 8:49:58 AM
- I can only see disadvantages to a moon based observatory - R.L. - 8/7/2005 6:25:58 AM
- Goodbye Uncle Eddie - phil - 8/7/2005 4:04:52 AM
  - The loons always return - Gary - 8/7/2005 9:28:36 PM
- Low Earth Orbit is easier, cheaper, and better. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 8/7/2005 3:33:33 AM
- Costs vs Risk Reduction Table From NASA's NEO Office - Mark Eby - 8/6/2005 8:27:46 PM
  - Botched Summary Link: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/report.html (n/t) - Mark Eby - 8/6/2005 8:30:11 PM
- Great Reference Chris - Mark Eby - 8/6/2005 2:59:28 PM
- And you have the power and authority to prevent lunar telescopes [optical or radio] from coming to pass, Chris? (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 8/5/2005 12:22:13 AM
  - re: Huh? Why would I want it. If it makes sense it will happen. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 8/5/2005 7:18:26 AM
- So yesterday's news... - ken murphy - 8/4/2005 11:59:58 PM
  - Because It Was A Recent Topic Of Discussion - Mark Eby - 8/6/2005 9:44:46 PM
  - re: But still relevant... - Chris Vancil - 8/5/2005 7:17:01 AM
- Bets anyone? - alcaray - 8/4/2005 3:49:13 PM
  - re:Not the point. - Chris Vancil - 8/4/2005 9:47:43 PM
    - No current logic? - Jascob Samorodin - 8/5/2005 12:20:36 AM
      - re: No current logic? - Chris Vancil - 8/5/2005 7:05:34 AM
  - re: Bets anyone? - Doug Ellison - 8/4/2005 4:03:43 PM
    - So it's a bet? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/4/2005 4:20:09 PM
- re: On Lunar Surface Telescopes: Dr. Daniel Lester testimony to Subcommittee on Space... - Doug Ellison - 8/4/2005 12:39:59 PM
  - re: On Lunar Surface Telescopes: Dr. Daniel Lester testimony to Subcommittee on Space... - E.P. Grondine - 8/4/2005 12:55:54 PM
    - re: On Lunar Surface Telescopes: Dr. Daniel Lester testimony to Subcommittee on Space... - Doug Ellison - 8/4/2005 2:21:41 PM
- re: On Lunar Surface Telescopes: Dr. Daniel Lester testimony to Subcommittee on Space... - E.P. Grondine - 8/4/2005 12:35:23 PM
- Arthur C. Clarke knew that in 1960... - Adam - 8/4/2005 9:48:03 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (24 posts)