Space/Science » in reply to Looks like we are finally going to get it right. Thanks Chris.

More like "getting from here to here."

Tom Brosz — 7/3/2006 3:30:48 PM (archived)

We seem to have come a long way to get back to the 1950s and 1960s. I'm glad it's going somewhere again, but we spent a long time on some evolutionary dead ends, and failed government attempts to bring real reusability to spaceships.

Chesley Bonestell and Von Braun with model of original idea.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (40 posts)

• The New Lunar lander And New Moon/Mars Crew Vehicles - Jeff F - 10/13/2005 2:47:06 AM
  • Manned Flybys/Orbital missions - Adam - 7/10/2006 11:14:32 AM
  • Complete final report for Exploration Space Architecture Study - Tom Brosz - 7/3/2006 3:34:21 PM
  • re: Northrop Grumman Press Release - Chris Vancil - 10/13/2005 7:10:48 PM
    • Looks like we are finally going to get it right. Thanks Chris. - REB - 10/13/2005 7:21:41 PM
      • More like "getting from here to here." - Tom Brosz - 7/3/2006 3:30:48 PM
        • I still see it as a move forward. - REB - 7/5/2006 2:16:15 PM
      • I can't imagine how a capsule design can even begin to live up to those words. - Lee - 10/14/2005 5:19:09 AM
        • re: I can't imagine how a capsule design can even begin to live up to those words. - Doug Ellison - 7/11/2006 8:49:27 AM
        • As for Mars - REB - 10/14/2005 1:22:19 PM
        • Have you ever seen the inside of a Navy submarine? - Larry J - 10/14/2005 1:12:58 PM
          • a daughter's opinion - phil - 7/11/2006 12:10:13 AM
            • re: a daughter's opinion tour of the Albacore - phil - 7/11/2006 12:14:27 AM
            • re: a daughter's opinion tour of the Albacore - phil - 7/11/2006 12:14:24 AM
          • Now if we could only launch a submarine into space! - Murph the Smurf - 10/15/2005 1:18:46 PM
        • And... - REB - 10/14/2005 12:58:45 PM
        • It is a start. - REB - 10/14/2005 12:28:02 PM
        • re: I can't imagine how a capsule design can even begin to live up to those words. - Jeff F - 10/14/2005 8:57:20 AM
        • re: Moon orbit too - Raoul - 10/14/2005 5:35:24 AM
          • re: Moon orbit too - Jeff F - 10/14/2005 8:58:43 AM
          • I still thing the CEVs should be a more permanent design - Lee - 10/14/2005 6:15:12 AM
            • Other than nostalgia and publicity for space exploration... - LJK - 10/14/2005 2:14:34 PM
              • Space is about far more than just exploring. - Lee - 10/15/2005 12:27:17 AM
                • re: Space is about far more than just exploring. - lance - 10/16/2005 1:04:41 PM
                  • As Raoul said, it's from a sci-fi show. - Lee - 10/16/2005 7:17:39 PM
                  • re: The Eagle - Raoul - 10/16/2005 5:28:45 PM
                • Calling all Engineers. Is the Space 1999 Eagle a workable design? - REB - 10/15/2005 4:15:03 PM
                  • Some real world modifications would be needed, but it is a very workable design. - Lee - 10/15/2005 6:41:55 PM
                    • re: Some real world modifications would be needed, but it is a very workable design. - LJK - 10/17/2005 12:20:04 AM
                      • re: Some real world modifications would be needed, but it is a very workable design. - Patrick - 7/3/2006 3:50:05 AM
                        • Can I introduce you to the concept of the Paragraph? - nick hoffman - 7/4/2006 2:07:54 PM
                          • re: Can I introduce you to the concept of the Paragraph? - patrick - 7/9/2006 5:44:53 PM
                            • The first rule of discussion, regardless of topic, is Clarity. - Fox - 7/10/2006 10:27:18 PM
                          • AMEN..... (n/t) - R.L. - 7/5/2006 11:21:30 AM
                        • re: I agree - Johannes - 7/3/2006 6:33:18 PM
              • Establishing colonies, for one. - REB - 10/14/2005 2:59:40 PM
      • Skight correction - REB - 10/13/2005 7:31:10 PM
  • A Closer Look... - McFly - 10/13/2005 5:39:43 PM
    • agreed - excellent article (n/t) - Daniel - 10/14/2005 12:24:12 PM
  • At least the CEV is okay - E.P. - 10/13/2005 2:17:11 PM