A science can make repeatable predictions of fundamental laws economics can not. This again is one of those wanting to appear in control even though your not things.
Sure why don't we make all children cower under our thumb. I'm sure eliminating that which make us hopeful will inspire them.
I prefer this silly little song:
You're out of the woods
You're out of the dark
You're out of the night
Step into the sun, step into the light
Keep straight ahead
For the most glorious place
On the Face of the Earth
Or the sky
Hold onto your breath
Hold onto your heart
Hold onto your hope
March up to the gate
And bid it open
Of course it's titled "Optimistic Voices" and comes from a classic of childhood...and I think I've turned back on topic...
Space/Science » in reply to That's one of the reasons why economics is called the dismal science
re: This is now off topic.
The whole thread (50 posts)
- Must Hubble be saved?
- re: To control it's deorbit we would still need to visit Hubble.
- Another idea
- Here's an idea
- re: What a bizarre notion...
- Hurts to say it...
- re: Yes!
- Wasn't Spitzer intended to replace the HST, in which case it is obsolete?
