I wonder how much more effecient this engine is, exactly?
The SpaceDaily.com version of this story says: Calculations suggest that a helicon double layer thruster would take up a little more space than the main electric thruster on ESA's SMART-1 mission, yet it could potentially deliver many times more thrust at higher powers of up to 100 kW whilst giving a similar fuel efficiency. Does that mean it requires a more powerful source of electricity too?
