In Tom's defense (not that he needs my help)...

Current Events » in reply to Names please?

In Tom's defense (not that he needs my help)...

McFly — 1/5/2006 6:33:42 PM (archived)

I've seen such compilations as well. The Clintons, Kerry, heck I think even Teddy K might have been in there (maybe not, can't recall). There were people all over the political spectrum who spoke out about how Saddam was a clear and present danger to...well, to pretty much everyone...and further, who advocated *some* kind of action to render him harmless. A bunch of that stuff has been posted in here at least a few times, I think.

As it turns out, there's now a powerful vacuum formed by the absence of evidence to back up those assumptions about Saddam's intentions and capabilities. A whole bunch of us were just plain flat-out wrong about the danger Saddam posed to the world. We should have had more faith in the UN's work in Iraq (that one's for you, Tom :-) and not been in such a hurry to start flinging bombs.

The whole thread (32 posts)

Americans starting to wise up - alcaray - 1/4/2006 5:00:02 PM
- re: Americans starting to wise up - Tom Brosz - 1/4/2006 9:08:32 PM
  - re: In Iraq - Raoul - 1/5/2006 6:27:05 PM
    - Where do you draw any of those conclusions from those articles? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 7:48:27 PM
      - re: Connection? - Raoul - 1/5/2006 9:56:39 PM
        
        re: Connection? - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2006 1:34:45 AM
  - Names please? - Tony - 1/5/2006 12:12:37 PM
    - In Tom's defense (not that he needs my help)... - McFly - 1/5/2006 6:33:42 PM
      - Ah but that's different, as I noted - Tony - 1/5/2006 7:18:02 PM
        
        re: Ah but that's different - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 7:39:41 PM
        
        No, and again no. Breaking one of my New Year Resolutions already*...... - Tony - 1/5/2006 8:04:31 PM
        
        Okay, okay... - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2006 1:33:48 AM
        
        the Great Clinton - McFly - 1/6/2006 1:59:55 PM
        
        Tony: no matter what you say, Tom hears what he wants. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/5/2006 7:47:14 PM
    - No. - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 5:55:13 PM
      - Try reading what I actually wrote, not what you think I wrote. - Tony - 1/5/2006 7:19:04 PM
      - re: Opinions - Raoul - 1/5/2006 6:49:52 PM
  - Do ya think Saudis might have been involved in WTC? - Bowser - 1/5/2006 1:56:40 AM
  - Not even the CIA believed that. You, sitting in CA, know it all??!! - Bowser - 1/4/2006 11:20:19 PM
    - I don't have to know it all. Just more than you. - Tom Brosz - 1/4/2006 11:40:00 PM
      - Don't have to know it all. - SteveS - 1/5/2006 12:43:47 AM
      - So... - alcaray - 1/5/2006 12:25:16 AM
        
        Yes. That was the second paragraph in my first response. - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 4:18:27 AM
        
        I think you are confused. Doesn't say anything about 9/11. - alcaray - 1/5/2006 5:12:45 PM
        
        What? Like Conclusion 93? (n/t) - Tony - 1/5/2006 4:43:13 PM
  - I won't "take a major hit" if good things happen in Iraq. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/4/2006 10:07:55 PM
    - re: I won't "take a major hit" if good things happen in Iraq. - Tom Brosz - 1/4/2006 11:16:30 PM
      - I keep thinking that your responses to my posts are responses to me - alcaray - 1/4/2006 11:27:45 PM
        
        Ya can't expect tracking. Never done it, never will. A crackpot. (n/t) - Bowser - 1/5/2006 1:57:46 AM
  - re: Unprovoked war - Raoul - 1/4/2006 9:37:13 PM
- So a whacky hold-out - SteveS - 1/4/2006 8:23:45 PM
  - no - alcaray - 1/4/2006 10:06:17 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (32 posts)