Okay, okay...

Current Events » in reply to No, and again no. Breaking one of my New Year Resolutions already*......

Okay, okay...

Tom Brosz — 1/6/2006 1:33:48 AM (archived)

Looking at the exact wording, I phrased it wrong. A normal person would have known what I was referring to.

Let me rephrase it:

One hell of a lot of Democrats who now profess that there was never any reason to fear Saddam Hussein, his weapons, or his policies, professed precisely the opposite when it was politically convenient for them to do so.

Not only that, but they endlessly condemn all those who drew exactly the same conclusions they drew back then, and based on the same intelligence sources.

Does that help?

I've seen endless excuses for this 180 degree snaparound, but my favorite was the person who informed me that Saddam DID have weapons factories and stockpiles, but the Great Clinton destroyed them all down the the last crate during Desert Fox.

The whole thread (32 posts)

Americans starting to wise up - alcaray - 1/4/2006 5:00:02 PM
- re: Americans starting to wise up - Tom Brosz - 1/4/2006 9:08:32 PM
  - re: In Iraq - Raoul - 1/5/2006 6:27:05 PM
    - Where do you draw any of those conclusions from those articles? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 7:48:27 PM
      - re: Connection? - Raoul - 1/5/2006 9:56:39 PM
        
        re: Connection? - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2006 1:34:45 AM
  - Names please? - Tony - 1/5/2006 12:12:37 PM
    - In Tom's defense (not that he needs my help)... - McFly - 1/5/2006 6:33:42 PM
      - Ah but that's different, as I noted - Tony - 1/5/2006 7:18:02 PM
        
        re: Ah but that's different - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 7:39:41 PM
        
        No, and again no. Breaking one of my New Year Resolutions already*...... - Tony - 1/5/2006 8:04:31 PM
        
        Okay, okay... - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2006 1:33:48 AM
        
        the Great Clinton - McFly - 1/6/2006 1:59:55 PM
        
        Tony: no matter what you say, Tom hears what he wants. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/5/2006 7:47:14 PM
    - No. - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 5:55:13 PM
      - Try reading what I actually wrote, not what you think I wrote. - Tony - 1/5/2006 7:19:04 PM
      - re: Opinions - Raoul - 1/5/2006 6:49:52 PM
  - Do ya think Saudis might have been involved in WTC? - Bowser - 1/5/2006 1:56:40 AM
  - Not even the CIA believed that. You, sitting in CA, know it all??!! - Bowser - 1/4/2006 11:20:19 PM
    - I don't have to know it all. Just more than you. - Tom Brosz - 1/4/2006 11:40:00 PM
      - Don't have to know it all. - SteveS - 1/5/2006 12:43:47 AM
      - So... - alcaray - 1/5/2006 12:25:16 AM
        
        Yes. That was the second paragraph in my first response. - Tom Brosz - 1/5/2006 4:18:27 AM
        
        I think you are confused. Doesn't say anything about 9/11. - alcaray - 1/5/2006 5:12:45 PM
        
        What? Like Conclusion 93? (n/t) - Tony - 1/5/2006 4:43:13 PM
  - I won't "take a major hit" if good things happen in Iraq. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/4/2006 10:07:55 PM
    - re: I won't "take a major hit" if good things happen in Iraq. - Tom Brosz - 1/4/2006 11:16:30 PM
      - I keep thinking that your responses to my posts are responses to me - alcaray - 1/4/2006 11:27:45 PM
        
        Ya can't expect tracking. Never done it, never will. A crackpot. (n/t) - Bowser - 1/5/2006 1:57:46 AM
  - re: Unprovoked war - Raoul - 1/4/2006 9:37:13 PM
- So a whacky hold-out - SteveS - 1/4/2006 8:23:45 PM
  - no - alcaray - 1/4/2006 10:06:17 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (32 posts)