I'm glad you found them funny. That was me on the edge of flaming, the bitter edge...
Until, I realized the recipient of the comment has a brain that's largely devolved into an anger actuator, and that it's comments don't represent a significant demographic here.
Still, I mean how far do we have to look to see similar nonsense (in the context of Free-America, not neo-conerica) from cranial-zepplins who claim to be the most ardent defenders of all the U.S. stands for. If Bushie's handlers ever place him before a camera without the proper neurochemical balance, you have to wonder what the result of an unfortunate series of comments might be. I don't doubt that something that could be interpreted as "liberal purge today" would have disasterous consequences. Yes, I hope I'm paranoid. I really do. The more I see of comments of this nature by neural-puddings like DF'nM though, I wonder....
Current Events » in reply to It's a subset of the new definition of "treason"
I got steamed milk coming out of my ears....
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Osama Bin Laden's book endorsement boosts sales
- Remember that thread where some Al Q boss said he preferred Bush in '04? (n/t)
- Speaking of anti-American...
- Do you know one damn thing about the book? Or are you just throwing 'TRAITOR' around for fun- THIS GOES FOR TOM TOO
- Demonizing is pap for the masses. Turns people into sheep.
- Is this flame? No.
- Treason? No. Anti-American? Yes.
- It's a subset of the new definition of "treason"
- Yeah yeah yeah