Current Events » in reply to They are in bad taste and at least rude.

The whole thread (32 posts)

• To all democracy lovers - check this one out for a laugh - Daniel - 2/2/2006 11:57:59 AM
  • Well, that didn't work. Here's the original page URL - Daniel - 2/2/2006 12:01:28 PM
    • They are in bad taste and at least rude. - alcaray - 2/2/2006 6:43:59 PM
      • re: you've been to a Hockey game in Thunder Bay!!! - Scott Evil - 2/2/2006 11:56:40 PM
      • tough. - Daniel - 2/2/2006 10:59:54 PM
        • Well, I can't see what this is about. - et - 2/3/2006 4:03:05 AM
          • re: I think the point is...That it is about freedom of speech. - Scott Evil - 2/3/2006 2:29:21 PM
            • Of course that's what it is - read my post directly below yours (n/t) - Daniel - 2/3/2006 3:05:25 PM
              • re: I know that...But you must realize that the pollitically correct pop-culture intellegencia are above all else--Reactionary. - Scott Evil - 2/3/2006 4:06:11 PM
                • a brief encounter yesterday got me wondering - Daniel - 2/3/2006 4:47:19 PM
                  • re: help me! what do you mean by pram? A baby buggy? - Scott Evil - 2/3/2006 4:54:16 PM
                    • yes that's it - Daniel - 2/3/2006 5:25:11 PM
          • re: Well, I can't see what this is about. - Daniel - 2/3/2006 5:17:53 AM
            • Not smart enough to stay out of this one... - et - 2/3/2006 7:02:51 PM
        • Tell me when my timeout is over with, Daddy. (n/t) - alcaray - 2/3/2006 12:07:05 AM
      • re: A huge story over here - Raoul - 2/2/2006 7:50:46 PM
        • I've been following it. - Tom Brosz - 2/3/2006 2:34:06 AM
        • something worth noting - Daniel - 2/2/2006 11:54:28 PM
          • Something else worth noting - Mary Anne - 2/3/2006 1:21:09 AM
            • same words, opposite meaning - Daniel - 2/3/2006 1:54:44 AM
              • How many Muslims do you know? - Mary Anne - 2/3/2006 2:06:18 AM
                • don't be so silly - Daniel - 2/3/2006 2:19:50 AM
                  • Nasty, angry, with you there's no difference. - Mary Anne - 2/3/2006 2:47:47 AM
                    • your reply contains evidence of your true prejudice - Daniel - 2/3/2006 2:59:05 AM
                      • All right, that's it. I'll see you at Flame, if you can take it. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 2/3/2006 3:02:47 AM
                        • No thanks - stick to your promise. I'm not interested. (n/t) - Daniel - 2/3/2006 3:09:12 AM
                          • Of course not. Coward. (n/t) - Mary Anne - 2/3/2006 3:25:15 AM
                            • No 'coward' would give back at you as I do here. A better description would be 'refusing to waste more time arguing' (n/t) - Daniel - 2/3/2006 3:47:23 AM
                              • heh... right... - Mary Anne - 2/3/2006 4:17:24 AM
        • Freedom of the press is a separate issue entirely. - alcaray - 2/2/2006 9:34:49 PM
    • That's IT? (n/t) - Bowser - 2/2/2006 2:58:37 PM
      • works for me (n/t) - Achmed Ibn Al-Daneel Jazz-Era - 2/2/2006 4:10:20 PM