Just wondering...
The anti-choice groups have long specialized in two ugly rhetorical tricks: Brutal imagery like the pictures of fetuses...
What exactly makes a picture of a fetus "brutal?" Are the photos misleading? Do they add something to the photos digitally to show something that isn't really there? Or is there something wrong with using accurate if uncomfortable imagery to make a point?
I spent a lot of time here and elsewhere listening to anti-war people tell me why it was critically important to show the brutal photos from Abu Ghraib, as opposed to just discussing the facts of the matter.
Think about it a while. If you can't stand the imagery, don't do the actions, right?
