You know, I'm going to actually give this a shot:
- Gruber declared that there weren't all that many people being forced to change their insurance from something they chose themselves to something the government has approved for them. He said it only affects individual policy holders, not employer-provided insurance, so what's the big deal?
The quote from the article:
"About eighty per cent of Americans are more or less left alone by the health-care act—largely people who have health insurance through their employers.
- I pointed out, with sources, that next year employer-provided insurance is going to run into exactly the same buzzsaw. It would have been this year, but Obama changed the Law of the Land without legislation.
- This is no big secret. The delay of the employer mandate made news for weeks. So either Gruber was lying, or he's ignorant. There isn't a third option. I'll go for "ignorant" for the author of the article, who obediently wrote down Gruber's bullshit without questions.
Does that land anywhere?