Bush's New Bunker Busters

Lindy — 4/25/2006 8:03:44 PM (archived)

Seeing as he had the designs on the table for this right after our invasion of Iraq, AND got the money to develop them, now he plans on USING them.
But how safe are they?

Here's an animation video from the Union of Concerned <Scientists.>

The whole thread (16 posts)

Bush's New Bunker Busters - Lindy - 4/25/2006 8:03:44 PM
- The Union of Concerned Scientists is also against RTGs - Lee - 4/26/2006 5:55:19 AM
  - Nuclear Energy - Lindy - 4/26/2006 3:39:00 PM
    - "'Allowing' American car manufacturers to develop and market...?" - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2006 3:41:20 AM
    - Nuclear Energy is a lot better than the alternative - R.L. - 4/26/2006 6:13:29 PM
      - I hate to be such a pessimist... - alcaray - 4/26/2006 10:20:11 PM
        
        Nuclear waste and fuel supply - Laurie Street - 4/27/2006 10:07:49 PM
        
        re: I hate to be such a pessimist... - gbaikie - 4/27/2006 1:13:02 AM
        
        How much energy do you expend getting it to the moon... - alcaray - 4/27/2006 2:56:04 PM
        
        re: How much energy do you expend getting it to the moon... - gbaikie - 4/27/2006 8:30:30 PM
        
        Looks like a whacky idea to me (n/t) - alcaray - 4/27/2006 9:20:12 PM
        
        if you feel okay about getting it off the planet, - podrock - 4/27/2006 1:30:06 AM
        
        re: if you feel okay about getting it off the planet, - gbaikie - 4/27/2006 2:13:49 AM
        
        Hubbert's peak applies to all finite commodities. - podrock - 4/27/2006 1:07:09 AM
      - re: Nuclear Energy is a lot better than the alternative - gbaikie - 4/26/2006 9:38:28 PM
      - Apply the American genius... - Laurie Street - 4/26/2006 9:32:53 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (16 posts)