Off Topic » in reply to re: How much energy do you expend getting it to the moon...

The whole thread (16 posts)

• Bush's New Bunker Busters - Lindy - 4/25/2006 8:03:44 PM
  • The Union of Concerned Scientists is also against RTGs - Lee - 4/26/2006 5:55:19 AM
    • Nuclear Energy - Lindy - 4/26/2006 3:39:00 PM
      • "'Allowing' American car manufacturers to develop and market...?" - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2006 3:41:20 AM
      • Nuclear Energy is a lot better than the alternative - R.L. - 4/26/2006 6:13:29 PM
        • I hate to be such a pessimist... - alcaray - 4/26/2006 10:20:11 PM
          • Nuclear waste and fuel supply - Laurie Street - 4/27/2006 10:07:49 PM
          • re: I hate to be such a pessimist... - gbaikie - 4/27/2006 1:13:02 AM
            • How much energy do you expend getting it to the moon... - alcaray - 4/27/2006 2:56:04 PM
              • re: How much energy do you expend getting it to the moon... - gbaikie - 4/27/2006 8:30:30 PM
                • Looks like a whacky idea to me (n/t) - alcaray - 4/27/2006 9:20:12 PM
            • if you feel okay about getting it off the planet, - podrock - 4/27/2006 1:30:06 AM
              • re: if you feel okay about getting it off the planet, - gbaikie - 4/27/2006 2:13:49 AM
          • Hubbert's peak applies to all finite commodities. - podrock - 4/27/2006 1:07:09 AM
        • re: Nuclear Energy is a lot better than the alternative - gbaikie - 4/26/2006 9:38:28 PM
        • Apply the American genius... - Laurie Street - 4/26/2006 9:32:53 PM