YOUR bias is showing- the reason lindy gets challenged on her posts (I am not the only one challenging), is because she posts the most bullshit... You know it, and most everyone else knows it.. from astrology to 'the jupiter effect' she posts crap at a rate that far exceeds the other posters... She posts easily proven lies and is 'OUTRAGED' by them, and when she is caught in a lie she hides behind lies like 'I was just putting other's ideas out there', and ' Why do you pick on a poor white woman?!' (AND Yes she did use the 'poor white woman' defense, as if her gender or color mattered....)
You think this village idiot contributes- FINE, but when she acts like the village idiot the village has a right to say so... I am not the only one calling her on her lies....
Lindy is at best a fool... at worst she deliberately spreads hateful lies...
You go ahead and defend her if you want- but as she likes to say..."This is Flame"
Flame » in reply to Hiding behind "women's lib"
Absolute BS and you know it...
The whole thread (77 posts)
- Just for Fun, and to say "thanks, carbon units".
- You missed the elitist background of the lyrics...
- Music, heritage, etc
- The 60's
- re: The 60's
- Kumbaya? 1962?
- Vance Packard
- Never read him
- re: Never read him
- "Any more questions? "
- My sign is "Yield"
- pretending to care about astrology can get you laid
- Whoa, boy, here we go. (n/t)
- Scuse me?
- re: Scuse me?
- re: Scuse me?
- Ancient nonsense?
- "Ever had your chart done with a thorough interpretation from an accomplished astrologer? "
- Lindy's using Reagan as a reference? Hell has frozen over. (n/t)
- re: Ancient nonsense?
- Ancient Garbage
- Ancient nonsense?
- My sign is "Yield"
- "Any more questions? "
- re: Never read him
- Never read him
- Vance Packard
- Kumbaya? 1962?
- re: The 60's
- re: The 60's
- re: The 60's
