that would definitely be a fraction and I doubt that the sexualy suppressed among conservatives would exceed the liberal prude fraction. The error is to associate the perceived traits of the absolutely worst examples of liberal or conservative and project those traits to the whole body of thinking.

Limbaugh's popularity will not be affected by this viagra incident any more than it was by the far more serious drug incident. Doctors (liberal and conservative) are handing out samples of viagra like candy and occasional use is not restricted to the sexually dysfunctional. Nearly every man I know over 40 has experimented with the drug. I suspect that the religious fraction that you refer to would, at most, insist that the drug be restricted to aiding sex from the missionary position.

The religious right may be screwed up in many ways but their sexual appetites are not suppressed.

It would be easy to say that liberals have the edge on deviate sex but that would also be inncorrect. I think we are talking about a normal curve thing with no correlation to politics.

Funny that you refer to yourself as a "card carrying liberal" when I have read enough of your thoughts to opine that you would be uncomfortable in the company of and pummelled by many liberal groups. You are, based on your HZ persona a "card carrying moderate".

Choosing self labels is often more about mirror image self than reality.