faith based, not science based
The discussion can end for you because I have had the effrontery to point out the obvious, that the 'new paradigms' are seriously incomplete. You're behaving as if someone has criticized articles of personal faith, not science. The fact that the self-appointed critics have yet to produce any falsifyable experiments of note means that their position is not yet science, just fun speculative sci-fi. The new paradigm proponents are reduced to polemics, wailing about the injustice of flawed present efforts but offering little in the way of substance for alternative scientific investigation. Call me when they are running some real scientific investigations. I'll be all for it.